Pulling Together

Article, New Law JournalJune 2017

Legal

Working together makes the expert/instructing solicitor relationship stronger, as James Stanbury explains.

As appeared in New Law Journal, 2 June 2017

By James Stanbury

There is a continuing debate over the type of expert that should be used on a case. For an instructing solicitor, it is clearly important to choose the right expert, who has experience relevant to the case. The question arises, in some cases, whether it is better to appoint an industry expert or a “professional” expert. It can and does happen in my field of forensic accounting. Take, for example, a claim for loss of profit from a fire or flood at a hotel: should a hotel expert, who has worked in the industry, be appointed or a professional accounting expert who has experience of dealing with economic damages claims from hotels over many years?

Of course, expert requirements turn on the facts of a case and the balance of choice can be difficult and opens up the question of ‘what makes someone an expert?’ If industry experts make poor expert witnesses, it is usually a result of their unfamiliarity with their role and duty to the court (and not their instructing party) and a difficulty to translate and apply their experience to the case itself, thinking that experience will trump objective analysis on its own, which can undermine the credibility that their sector experience can bring. In my field, it is relatively rare to find one’s opponent to be an industry expert suggesting that appropriate forensic financial analysis is important whatever the industry.

Read the rest of the article at New Law Journal

Related News and Insights

News

June 2017

Employee fraud: how should you respond to a tip-off?

Do you know what a "typical" corporate fraudster looks like? What red flags should you be looking for? And - most importantly as a risk manager - what should your first actions be if potential fraudulent activity is brought to your attention?
These were just some of the questions addressed by RGL Forensics at an Airmic Academy which delved into the serious but little-understood subject of investigating employee fraud.

iStock 628481600 magnifying glass calculator spreadsheet

Article

June 2017

Forensic Accounting: Is it Really Lost Income? (Part 3)

In California Lawyer, Mary Furst and James McCurley discuss how forensic accountants can assist counsel to dig deep when preparing—and contesting—claims of economic loss.

Article

June 2017

Will the Next Government Dismantle the SFO?

Here John Burgar, Head of Investigations at RGL Forensics, talks to Lawyer Monthly about the current work of the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) in the UK, and the current government agendas for confronting fraud crimes across the nation.

Article

June 2017

WannaCry: The lessons learned for insurance

The recent WannaCry ransomware attack has put into sharp focus the daily operational risks that face both the public and private sectors. The Press spotlight in the UK was understandably on the NHS, but the effects were felt by the private sector too and the cyber insurance market has responded accordingly. Indeed, the nature of the attack – its timing (on a Friday), its geographical reach over a broad range of industries and its seeming pinpoint on older operating systems – raises various issues for cyber insurers.

Looking for more?

Get in touch with our London Office

01:22 pm

Local time